5 Computation of first-order deformation
In the case the nonintegrated density of the first-order deformation
(see (64)) becomes
|
(97) |
We can further decompose in a natural manner as a sum between two kinds
of deformations
|
(98) |
where
contains only fields/ghosts/antifields from the BF
sector and
describes the cross-interactions between the
two theories.6 The piece
is completely known [32]. It is parameterized
by seven smooth, but otherwise arbitrary functions of the undifferentiated
scalar field,
and
. In the sequel we analyze the cross-interacting
piece,
.
Due to the fact that
and
involve
different types of fields and that
separately satisfies an
equation of the type (62), it follows that
is
subject to the equation
|
(99) |
for some local current
. In the sequel we determine
the general solution to (88) that complies with all the hypotheses
mentioned in the beginning of section 4.
In agreement with (86), the general solution to the equation
can be chosen to stop
at antighost number
|
(100) |
We will show in Appendixes A, B and C that we can
always take
into decomposition (89), without loss of nontrivial
contributions. Consequently, the first-order deformation of the solution to
the master equation in the interacting case can be taken to stop at
antighost number two
|
(101) |
where the components on the right-hand side of (90) are subject to
equations (68) and (66)-(67) for .
The piece
as solution to equation (68) for has the general form expressed by (75) for , with
from
. Looking at formula (76)
and also at relation (81) in antighost number two and requiring
that
mixes BRST generators from the BF and
sectors, we get that the most general solution to (68) for
reads as7
where all quantities denoted by or are some real, arbitrary
constants.
In the above and from now on we will use a compact writing in terms of the
Hodge duals
|
(104) |
Consequently
,
and
are the Hodge duals of
,
, and respectively
.
Substituting (91) in (66) for and using definitions (
35)-(52), we determine the solution
under the form
where
is the Hodge dual of
defined in (3) with respect to its
first three indices
|
(108) |
In the last formulas
is the dual of the
three-form
from action (1),
and
represent the duals
of the antifields
and respectively
from (28).
In the above
is the solution to the homogeneous
equation (68) in antighost number one, meaning that
is a nontrivial object from
in pure
ghost number one and in antighost number one. It is useful to decompose
like in (208)
|
(109) |
with
the solution to (68) for that
ensures the consistency of
in antighost number zero,
namely the existence of
as solution to (67)
for with respect to the terms from
containing
the constants of the type or , and
the
solution to (68) for that is independently consistent in
antighost number zero
|
(110) |
With the help of definitions (35)-(52) and taking into
account decomposition (208), we infer by direct computation
where
|
(113) |
and
are some local currents. In the above
and
represent the
Hodge duals of the one-form
and respectively of the two-form
from (2) and
is nothing but the Hodge dual of the tensor
defined in (72) with respect to its
first three indices, namely
|
(118) |
Inspecting (97), we observe that equation (67) for
possesses solutions if and only if expressed by (99) is
-exact modulo . A straightforward analysis of shows
that this is not possible unless
|
(119) |
Now, we insert conditions (101) in (91) and identify the
most general form of the first-order deformation in the interacting sector
at antighost number two
|
(120) |
The same conditions replaced in (97) enable us to write
|
(121) |
Introducing (103) in (95) and then the resulting result
together with (101) in (93), we obtain
|
(122) |
Next, we determine
as the solution to the
homogeneous equation (68) for that is independently consistent
in antighost number zero, i.e. satisfies equation (96). According to
(75) for the general solution to equation (68) for
has the form
where all the quantities denoted by , , , , or
are bosonic, gauge-invariant tensors, and therefore they may depend only on
given in (70) and their spacetime derivatives. The
functions
and
exhibit the mixed symmetry with respect to their lower indices
and, in addition,
is completely
antisymmetric with respect to its upper indices. The remaining functions,
, , , and , are separately antisymmetric (where
appropriate) in their upper and respectively lower indices.
In order to determine all possible solutions (105) we demand that
mixes the BF and sectors and (for the
first time) explicitly implement the assumption on the derivative order of
the interacting Lagrangian discussed in the beginning of section 4
and structured in requirements i) and ii). Because all the terms involving
the functions or contain only BRST generators from the BF
sector, it follows that each such function must contain at least one tensor
defined in (72), with as in (3). The corresponding terms from
, if
consistent, would produce an interacting Lagrangian that does not agree with
requirement ii) with respect to the BF fields and therefore we must take
|
(127) |
In the meantime, requirement ii) also restricts all the functions and to be derivative-free. Since the undifferentiated scalar field is
the only element among
and their spacetime derivatives that
contains no derivatives, it follows that all and may depend at
most on . Due to the fact that we work in and taking into
account the various antisymmetry properties of these functions, it follows
that the only eligible representations are
with , , and some real, smooth functions of . The same observation stands for
and
, so their tensorial behaviour can only
be realized via some constant Lorentz tensors. Nevertheless, there is no
such constant tensor in with the required mixed symmetry properties,
and hence we must put
|
(130) |
Inserting results (106)-(109) in (105), it
follows that the most general (nontrivial) solution to equation (68)
for that complies with all the working hypotheses, including that on
the differential order of the interacting Lagrangian, is given by
|
(131) |
By acting with on (110) and using definitions (35
)-(52) we infer
Comparing (111) with (96), we conclude that function reduces to a real constant and meanwhile functions and must vanish
|
(136) |
so (110) becomes
|
(137) |
wich produces trivial deformations because it is a trivial element from
|
(138) |
and by further taking
|
(139) |
As a consequence, we can safely take the nontrivial part of the first-order
deformation in the interaction sector in antighost number one, (104
), of the form
|
(140) |
In addition, (115) leads to
|
(141) |
in (96). Replacing now (101) and (117) in (97), we are able to identify the piece of antighost number zero from
the first-order deformation in the interacting sector as
|
(142) |
where
is the solution to the `homogeneous'
equation in antighost number zero
|
(143) |
We will prove in Appendix D that the only solution to (119)
that satisfies all our working hypotheses, including that on the derivative
order of the interacting Lagrangian, is
, such
that the nontrivial part of the first-order deformation in the interaction
sector in antighost number zero reads as
|
(144) |
The main conclusion of this section is that the general form of the
first-order deformation of the solution to the master equation as solution
to (58) for the model under study is expressed by
|
(145) |
where
can be found in [32] and
It is now clear that the first-order deformation is parameterized by seven
arbitrary, smooth functions of the undifferentiated scalar field (
and
corresponding to
and by two arbitrary, real
constants ( and from
). We will see in the
next section that the consistency of the deformed solution to the master
equation in order two in the coupling constant will restrict these functions
and constants to satisfy some specific equations.
Ashkbiz Danehkar
2018-03-26